On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 4:27 AM Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote: > > On 05.12.2018 20:45, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:39:55PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 19:36, Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:09:56AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> > > (+ Arnd) > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 09:06, Nathan Chancellor > >> > > <natechancel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:37:05AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> > > > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 02:42, Nathan Chancellor > >> > > > > <natechancel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > This flag is not supported by lld: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ld.lld: error: unknown argument: --pic-veneer > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Nate, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Does this mean ld.lld is guaranteed to produce position independent > >> > > > > veneers if you build kernels that are bigger than the typical > >> > > > > range of > >> > > > > a relative branch?
Just for the list, 2 patches to lld: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/286#issuecomment-452027802 -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
