Alexander Viro writes:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Dave Zarzycki wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>>
>>> However, kernfs is _not_ procfs \setminus procfs-proper. It's our current
>>> /proc/sys.
>>
>> Okay. I didn't realize that's what you had in mind when you wrote
>> "kernfs." Mind if I ask why you didn't call it "sysctlfs" or "sysfs?"
>
> Check *BSD.
Meanwhile, the FreeBSD people seem to be about to junk kernfs.
One is supposed to use sysctl. (freebsd-hackers or freebsd-arch
just this week)
I didn't know penguins went dumpster diving in Satan's trash.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/