David Schwartz wrote: > The code does its best to estimate how much actual entropy it is gathering. A potential weakness. The entropy estimator can be manipulated by feeding data which looks random to the estimator, but which is in fact not random at all. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- /dev/random: really secure? Karel Kulhavy
- RE: /dev/random: really secure? David Schwartz
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Karel Kulhavy
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? David Feuer
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Jamie Lokier
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Andreas Dilger
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Daniel Stone
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Kurt Garloff
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Peter Samuelson
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Pavel Machek
- RE: /dev/random: really secure? David Schwartz
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Martin Mares
- Re: /dev/random: really secure? Philipp Rumpf