On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote:
>
> Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs
> of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option.
Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and STR?
> If you feel that your system has been degraded
> because it now includes what used to be excluded under
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n, please let me know how.
I feel that I get asked to include a feature that
(a) I have no interest in on that machine
(b) I didn't need to include before.
What was the advantage? And what was it that caused something like this to
be a post-rc1 thing. That makes me really unhappy. This is a *regression*.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
