Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> This adds a general mechanism whereby a task can request the >>> scheduler to notify it whenever it is preempted or scheduled back >>> in. This allows the task to swap any special-purpose registers like >>> the fpu or Intel's VT registers. >>> >> ok, this looks very clean, i've added it to my scheduler tree. You've >> tested this with KVM, on both 32-bit and 64-bit, correct? >> > > note: i've done a hook -> notifier rename - 'hook' is way too generic > sounding and also slightly loaded. (updated patch below) > >
Okay, both i386 and x86_64 are happy (with the missing 'next' argument added, but with the old hook name). -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
