On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> --- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000
> +++ kernel-doc Sat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000
> @@ -664,10 +664,11 @@
> ##
> # takes a function prototype and spits out all the details
> -# stored in the global arrays/hsahes.
> +# stored in the global arrays/hashes.
> sub dump_function {
> my $prototype = shift @_;
> + $prototype =~ s/^const+ //;
> $prototype =~ s/^static+ //;
> $prototype =~ s/^extern+ //;
> $prototype =~ s/^inline+ //;
Since when did C accept constttttttttttttttttttt and staticcccccccc?
etc.
Should that be " +" not "+ " or is someone just trying to confuse me?
Or did someone try to mean s/foo//g by adding a +?
Yours confusedly,
Simon.
--
[ "Therapy is expensive. Popping bubble wrap is cheap. You choose." ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
