Hi Boris,

Sorry for confusion.

My intention was just to point to the correct patch number only. Earlier you 
have asked Mark to pick the patch [1] but that patch number was not correct.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/5/758

--
Regards
Yogesh Gaur

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezil...@bootlin.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 1:52 PM
> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com>; linux-
> m...@lists.infradead.org; marek.va...@gmail.com; linux-...@vger.kernel.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; r...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> shawn...@kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> computersforpe...@gmail.com; frieder.schre...@exceet.de; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode
> 
> Hi Yogesh,
> 
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:13:28 +0000
> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Patch has been resend [1], this patch is depends on the series of patch[2] 
> > and
> this series has been applied by Boris already.
> 
> You're still not asking the right person. Every patches touching things in
> drivers/mtd/ should be taken by me (or another MTD maintainer), and patches
> touching things in drivers/spi/ should be taken by Mark. So, the patch you're
> pointing to should be applied by me. Plus, I told you I would apply it after 
> 4.21-
> rc1 because I don't want to deal with the mtd -> spi dependency.
> 
> Please be patient.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Boris

Reply via email to