On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I think I'll duck this for now. Otherwise I have a suspicion that I'll > > be the first person to run it and I'm too old for such excitement. > > I always had the suspicion that you have some magical script > which will immediately tell you that a patch is not working ;-) sort of a defensive crouch. > Works fine on x86_64 (on top of the ctor cleanup patchset) and passes the > kernel build test but then there may be creatively designed drivers and > such that pass these flags to the slab allocators which will now BUG. __GFP_COLD looks OK. __GFP_COMP I'm not so sure about. drivers/char/drm/drm_pci.c:drm_pci_alloc() (and other places like infiniband) pass it into dma_alloc_coherent() which some architectures implement via slab. umm, arch/arm/mm/consistent.c is one such. __GFP_MOVABLE looks OK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
