On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:58:25AM -0500, jschopp wrote:
>> within the last 3 weeks, this script went from *really usable* to *a big
>> noise maker*.
>
> As we (mostly Andy of late) add more checks (good) there is bound to be
> some code we just didn't forsee that generates false positives (bad). You
> can see a consistent history of cleaning these up as quickly as people send
> them in. Hopefully in the interim there aren't too many false positives
> and the script is still useful. We do try to put the new tests through
> their paces before adding them in, but our imaginations are limited.
>
> The goal has always been to err on the side of missing badness in code to
> avoid false positives. This way, when there is output it has a very high
> chance of not wasting your time. Wait a couple weeks and it'll be there
> again.
>...
And it will be known as "noise maker" for years, even if that'll be
fixed in a few weeks...
Running it on the latest -rc or -mm should usually give good hints
whether the output has become better or worse.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
