On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > How about using a sentinel list entry representing the current position > in run_task_queue's loop? Nope. There may be multiple concurrent run_task_queue's executing, so for now I've applied Andrew Morton's patch that most closely gets the old behaviour of having a private list. HOWEVER, this does need to be re-visited. The task-queue handling is potantially something that should be completely re-vamped in the future. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue or tty_io are wron... Petr Vandrovec
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue or tty_io... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue or tt... Petr Vandrovec
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue or tt... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue or tt... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue o... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_que... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_tas... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_que... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_tas... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run... Jamie Lokier