On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 08:55:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:00:12 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > @@ -342,11 +342,9 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
> > bool hit_readahead_marker, pgoff_t offset,
> > unsigned long req_size)
> > {
> > - int max; /* max readahead pages */
> > - int sequential;
> > -
> > - max = ra->ra_pages;
> > - sequential = (offset - ra->prev_index <= 1UL) || (req_size > max);
> > + int max = ra->ra_pages; /* max readahead pages */
> > + pgoff_t prev_offset;
> > + int sequential;
> >
> > /*
> > * It's the expected callback offset, assume sequential access.
> > @@ -360,6 +358,9 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
> > goto readit;
> > }
> >
> > + prev_offset = ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > + sequential = offset - prev_offset <= 1UL || req_size > max;
>
> It's a bit pointless using an opaque type for prev_offset here, and then
> encoding the knowledge that it is implemented as "unsigned long".
>
> It's a minor thing, but perhaps just "<= 1" would make more sense here.
Yeah, "<= 1" is OK. But the expression still requires pgoff_t to be
'unsigned' to work correctly.
So what about "<= 1U"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
