On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:43:23 -0700
> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > __GFP_ZERO is implemented by the slab allocators (the page allocator
> > has no knowledge about the length of the object to be zeroed). The slab
> > allocators do not pass __GFP_ZERO to the page allocator.
> 
> OK, well that was weird.  So
> 
>       kmalloc(42, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> 
> duplicates
> 
>       kzalloc(42, GFP_KERNEL);

Correct.
 
> Why do it both ways?

There are now ~2.5k uses of kzalloc in the kernel.

kzalloc and friends implies that we need to duplicate all allocator 
functions. That was never done for NUMA allocators there was never a 
kzalloc_node f.e..

kzalloc also cannot be used in a parameterized way in a derived allocator 
where you would simply pass on the gfp flags.
 
__GFP_ZERO support allows all allocators to work in a consistent way. 
There is no need to special case slab zeroing allocation.

kzalloc could be removed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to