Satyam Sharma wrote:
> The (3) as I had originally written / meant was that multiple
> instructions in a volatile asm would not get _individually_
> interspersed with the rest of the code i.e. be emitted out
> _consecutively_. I don't think we need any such guarantees for
> the non-atomic variants of those operations, so it's good to
> let the compiler have a free hand with what it wants to do,
> and optimize/combine multiple bitops as necessary / possible,
> which was the original intention.
>
No, a single asm statement is always emitted in one piece. Gcc doesn't
parse the string other than to do %-substitution to insert arguments, so
it has no way to meaningfully split it up.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
