On Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:44:09 +0000 (GMT), David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The conditional compilation is far more obvious to people than subtle >issues with link order. So I prefer to avoid the latter at all costs. The rest of the kernel already depends totally on these "subtle" issues with link order. Why should mtd be different? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mtd (240t13p2) Rasmus Andersen
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mtd (240t13p2) Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mtd (240t1... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mtd (2... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mt... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drive... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in d... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] link time error ... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] link time error ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in d... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mt... Horst von Brand
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drive... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] link time error in drivers/mtd (240t13p2) David Woodhouse