On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 02:33:46PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 02:19:58PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Create an inline function for clflush(), with the proper arguments, > >> and use it instead of hard-coding the instruction. > >> > >> This also removes one instance of hard-coded wbinvd, based on a patch > >> by Bauder de Oliveira Costa. > > > > I don't see much sense in it. CLFLUSH is not priviledged, paravirt > > doesn't need to change and this adds just an unnecessary layer of > > abstraction. > > The main reason is that everyone seems to invoke it either incorrectly
Where is it incorrect? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
