On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:13:26AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove > > scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__ > > sections in header files. We know how obfuscated C can be, and this also > > applies to preprocessing. There's known CodingStyle about some points. > > The thing is to specify rules, that will be easy for `sed` to do cleaup > > job. > > > > ./linux/soundcard.h:#if (!defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(KERNEL) && > > !defined(INKERNEL) > > && !defined(_KERNEL)) || defined(USE_SEQ_MACROS) > > ./linux/stat.h:#if defined(__KERNEL__) || !defined(__GLIBC__) || (__GLIBC__ > > < 2) > > > > Split __KERNEL__ check, make only positive, i.e. > > > > #if defined(__KERNEL__) > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > > > ./linux/stat.h:#ifdef __KERNEL__ > > > > No `#else` and ending part to contain comment: > > > > ./linux/smb_fs_sb.h:#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ > > > > Simple enough: > > > > sed '/^#if[^_]*__KERNEL__/,/^#end[^_]*__KERNEL__/d' > > What are you trying to say with the above? > Sorry but I lost track of part of the discussion but you seems to havea point > here?
I want to suggest more easy and tools-friendly way of processing header files in the headrer_install target. One line above, one paragraph in CodingStyle, one tree revision from KJ group. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
