On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I would much more prefer this functionality to be integrated into unifdef.
> >There is no good reason to have two different preprocesisng methonds, one
> >being the sed based one and the other the unidef one.
> >
> >A sinlge dedicated program that contian the sum of the functionality would
> >be faster too.
>
> which functionality ? normalizing of whitespace or all these
> linux-specific hacks ? unifdef serves one specific function which is
> stated in its manpage: remove preprocessor conditionals from code.
At present the kernel has a private copy of unidef. So adjusting the
private copy for the needs of the kernels seems like a god plan.
didnt realize the kernel had integrated it since it didnt at first ...
so yeah, extending it however we see fit should be fine
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
