Ingo Molnar wrote:
> that's still an important question, but these changes are still needed
> nevertheless, to unbreak softlockup.c
Well, I'm happy with using jiffies as the backport fix for softlockup
(if sched_clock is indeed a problem there), but mainly because it won't
affect Xen. I don't know what effect it will have on vmi though.
cpu_clock seems like a good approach for .23 onwards. I guess I should
test it at some point...
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
