On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:39:55AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > About 4k stacks I was generally against them, much better to fail in > > fork than to risk corruption. The per-irq stack part is great feature > > instead (too bad it wasn't enabled for the safer 8k stacks). > > 8K stacks without IRQ stacks are not "safer" so I don't understand your > comment ?
Ouch, see the reports about 4k stack crashes. I agree they're not safe w/o irq stacks (like on x86-64), but they're generally safer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
