On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> And yes I can see that the whole point of the change is that
> they want to also forbids this:
>
> x()
> {
> goto out;
> out:
> }
>
> and I dislike not being allowed to do the above as well infact ;).
What's wrong with the - more readable - `break;' ?
regards,
Rik
--
Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
Trailer at 11.
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Franz Sirl
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Horst von Brand
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Michael Meissner
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Michael Meissner
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Thomas Dodd
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Michael Meissner
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Albert D. Cahalan

