On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > And yes I can see that the whole point of the change is that > they want to also forbids this: > > x() > { > goto out; > out: > } > > and I dislike not being allowed to do the above as well infact ;). What's wrong with the - more readable - `break;' ? regards, Rik -- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11. http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Franz Sirl
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Alan Cox
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Horst von Brand
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Michael Meissner
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Michael Meissner
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Thomas Dodd
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Michael Meissner
- Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Albert D. Cahalan