On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:42:28 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:10:25 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Please consider feeding knfsd patches through checkpatch in the
> > > future.  It did find several glitches in these patches which you
> > > might have chosen to address.
> >
> > OK.  I guess I'll wait till the next -mm is out, take a look, and
> > address your comments then.
>
> I probably won't get another -mm out until after the 2.6.23 merge window
> closes.  One reason for this is all the extra time which I need to
> devote to code-review, hint.
> 
> But I don't think there was anything which I identified in this nfsd
> batch which needs attention prior to a 2.6.23-rc1 merge.  The checkpatch
> stuff is more a "please do this next time" thing.

OK, so the following address the review comments.

The first two should really be applied before -rc1 if at all possible:

        - the first is a preexisting bug stumbled on while doing this
          work, also suitable for stable.
        - the second is a fix for a regression introduced by my patches.
          (Apologies!)

(The other three patches, as you say, can wait till after rc1.)

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to