On 07/18/2007 01:39 AM, Jesper Juhl wrote:

On 17/07/07, William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

At hch's suggestion I rewrote the separate IRQ stack configurability
patch into one making IRQ stacks mandatory and unconfigurable, and
hence enabled with 8K stacks.

For what it's worth, that sounds good to me - like something that we
would want merged.

Yes, seperate IRQ stacks make eminent sense in their own right.

Andrea Arcangeli's current thread on soft pages:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/6/346

is also interesting though in the context of 1-page stacks.

Rene.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to