On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:03:34 +0300 Thanos Makatos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I run several times the following test and what I've seen is that when 
> the buffer cache becomes full, unneeded dirty buffer heads are not evicted
> and no other memory allocation can happen (including reading a block 
> from the disk to the buffer cache). Should this happen?
> Here's the code that reproduces this issue:
> 
> for(i = 0; i < get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk)/8; i++) {
>         bh = __bread(bdev, i, PAGE_SIZE);
>         lock_buffer(bh);
>         memset(bh->b_data, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>         set_buffer_dirty(bh);
>         unlock_buffer(bh);
>         __brelse(bh);
> }
> 
> I added some printks printing the buffer head's reference counter: after 
> the '__bread' ref count is 2, after '__brelse' ref count is 1. Shouldn't 
> these
> numbers be 1 and 0 respectively? I added an extra 'put_bh' before (or 
> after) the '__brelse' but I get a BUG().

You've been very unkind to the VFS.  Put a balance_dirty_pages() call in
that loop to give the system an opportunity to do some writeback and
throttling.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to