Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

[David Riley]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> 
>         Actually, I suspect that quite a few of us had done that since long -
> IIRC I've got burned on 1.2/1.3 and decided that I had enough. Bugger if I
> remember what exactly it was - ISTR that it was restore(8) built with
> 1.3.<something> headers and playing funny games on 1.2, but it might be
> something else...

So then what's the correct header tree to put in /usr/include/linux?  I
could use the stock 2.2.14-patched headers that came with the dist, but
how often does it need to be updated?  Or should I use the latest 2.2?

-- 
"Windows for Dummies?  Isn't that redundant?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/