> Yes, but 2.96 is also binary incompatible with all non-redhat distro's.
> And since redhat is _the_ distro that commercial entities use to
> release software for, this was very arguably a bad move.
Except you conveniently ignore a few facts
o Someone else moved to 2.95 not RH . In fact some of us felt 2.95 wasnt
fit to ship at the time.
o We tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x
o Vendors not being stupid understand that they have a bigger market
share if they do that.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
