Hi Julia,

Thank you for the patch, but it doesn't apply to LED tree.

The patch causing the problem is out-of-LED-tree.

Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

On 12/6/18 9:28 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
Hello,

The code seems to be wrong in several ways.  If the continue is wanted,
the of_node_put is not needed; it will happen on the next iteration.  If
the continue is not wanted, the of_node_put is needed, and the continue
should be dropped.

julia

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:48:54 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] leds: tlc591xx: fix device_node_continue.cocci warnings

CC: [email protected]
TO: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
CC: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
CC: Jacek Anaszewski <[email protected]>
CC: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]

From: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>

drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c:342:3-14: ERROR: probable double put.

  Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
  explicit put causes a double put.

Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/device_node_continue.cocci

Fixes: 7b2d34aaede7 ("leds: tlc591xx: Add gpio output support")
CC: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
---

tree:   https://github.com/omap-audio/linux-audio peter/ti-linux-4.19.y/wip
head:   838f24e2deaf1229002bd6555eb7e889b09ac1f9
commit: 7b2d34aaede727b4abfc78061bbd2202fcd92bc8 [62/67] leds: tlc591xx: Add 
gpio output support
:::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 26 hours ago

Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!

  leds-tlc591xx.c |    1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
@@ -339,7 +339,6 @@ tlc591xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client
        for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
                err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
                if (err) {
-                       of_node_put(child);
                        continue;
                        return err;
                }



Reply via email to