Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu() is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 81388d028ac7..346b5a1fd062 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force) class->key = key; class->name = lock->name; class->subclass = subclass; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after); class->name_version = count_matching_names(class); -- 2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog
