On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:40:25 -0700 "Nish Aravamudan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Joe Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Patch gone too ;) I deleted it. I was hoping that you'd send me the final > > > finished product (please). > > > > > > > Ha.., the patch against 2.6.22, at your patch have use htlb_alloc_mask, but > > I > > cannot found it at 2.6.22 kernel tree, I think you must use difference > > kernel > > tree :) > > I believe this patch will be unnecessary if my "Fix hugetlb pool > allocation with empty nodes" patch gets pulled into -mm. > alloc_fresh_huge_page() now takes a mempolicy which is created by the > two callers, rather than reinventing interleaving itself. I believe > this will avoid the oops you saw. I am still waiting on some test > results (annoying -mm config changes) before I repost them (and they > depend on Christoph's fixes for memoryless nodes). Could be so, but the patch which I have queued is nice and simple and can be backported into 2.6.22.x. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
