On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 04:56:10PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On (12/07/07 22:32), Mel Gorman didst pronounce: > > > > Should we at least go for > > > > > > add-__gfp_movable-for-callers-to-flag-allocations-from-high-memory-that-may-be-migrated.patch > > > create-the-zone_movable-zone.patch > > > allow-huge-page-allocations-to-use-gfp_high_movable.patch > > > handle-kernelcore=-generic.patch > > > > > > in 2.6.23? > > > > Well, yes please from me obviously :) . There is one additional patch > > I would like to send on tomorrow and that is providing the movablecore= > > This is the patch. It has been boot-tested on a number of machines and > behaves as expected. Nick, with this in addition, do you have any > objection to the ZONE_MOVABLE patches going through to 2.6.23?
What's the status of making it configurable? I didn't see something in -mm for that yet? But that's not as important as ensuring the concept and user visible stuff is in good shape, which I no longer have any problems with. So yeah I think it would be good to get this in and get people up and running with it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
