Hello, Satyam Sharma wrote: > Anyway, we've wasted enough time and bandwidth discussing this > (relatively trivial) matter, and I know nobody's mind is changed after > the end of it all (at least mine won't), so I suggest let's stop. The > proposed change is in Greg's tree already, and if he's fine with it, > then there's not much to do about it, is there :-)
I have no problem regenerating the patchset without this allow-NULL patch but as I said, I see it as an improvement and we'll have to agree to disagree on that point. But, if you think NULL get/put() are bad, please go ahead and change things. As long as things stay consistent, I'm okay with, well, even slightly prefer not allowing NULL. Thanks. :-) -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
