On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> We will need these going forward in hotpath, i.e. from within
> dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state().
Well, as for patch2, please try to be a bit more descriptive of why
and what this patch does.
>
> Lets fetch and save them while the OPP tables are added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 8e554e6a82a2..0d928359b880 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -1907,12 +1907,21 @@ int of_genpd_add_provider_simple(struct device_node
> *np,
> ret);
> goto unlock;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Save table for faster processing while setting performance
> + * state.
> + */
> + genpd->opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(&genpd->dev);
> + WARN_ON(!genpd->opp_table);
The WARN_ON seems lazy. Why not implement a proper error path?
> }
>
> ret = genpd_add_provider(np, genpd_xlate_simple, genpd);
> if (ret) {
> - if (genpd->set_performance_state)
> + if (genpd->set_performance_state) {
> + dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(genpd->opp_table);
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&genpd->dev);
> + }
>
> goto unlock;
> }
> @@ -1965,6 +1974,13 @@ int of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(struct device_node
> *np,
> i, ret);
> goto error;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Save table for faster processing while setting
> + * performance state.
> + */
> + genpd->opp_table =
> dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed(&genpd->dev, i);
> + WARN_ON(!genpd->opp_table);
> }
>
> genpd->provider = &np->fwnode;
> @@ -1989,8 +2005,10 @@ int of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(struct device_node
> *np,
> genpd->provider = NULL;
> genpd->has_provider = false;
>
> - if (genpd->set_performance_state)
> + if (genpd->set_performance_state) {
> + dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(genpd->opp_table);
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&genpd->dev);
> + }
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
> @@ -2024,6 +2042,7 @@ void of_genpd_del_provider(struct device_node *np)
> if (!gpd->set_performance_state)
> continue;
>
> +
> dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(gpd->opp_table);
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&gpd->dev);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> index 642036952553..9ad101362aef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct genpd_power_state {
>
> struct genpd_lock_ops;
> struct dev_pm_opp;
> +struct opp_table;
>
> struct generic_pm_domain {
> struct device dev;
> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ struct generic_pm_domain {
> unsigned int performance_state; /* Aggregated max performance state */
> int (*power_off)(struct generic_pm_domain *domain);
> int (*power_on)(struct generic_pm_domain *domain);
> + struct opp_table *opp_table; /* OPP table of the genpd */
> unsigned int (*opp_to_performance_state)(struct generic_pm_domain
> *genpd,
> struct dev_pm_opp *opp);
> int (*set_performance_state)(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> --
> 2.19.1.568.g152ad8e3369a
>
Similar as for patch2, this makes sense to me. Although, let me review
the complete series before giving a final call.
Kind regards
Uffe
