On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:12:15 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:27:49 +1000 NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > From: J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Allow readonly access to vary depending on the pseudoflavor, using the > > flag passed with each pseudoflavor in the export downcall. > > > > Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ### Diffstat output > > ./include/linux/nfsd/export.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff .prev/include/linux/nfsd/export.h ./include/linux/nfsd/export.h > > --- .prev/include/linux/nfsd/export.h 2007-07-10 11:40:31.000000000 > > +1000 > > +++ ./include/linux/nfsd/export.h 2007-07-10 11:50:43.000000000 +1000 > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > > #define NFSEXP_ALLFLAGS 0xFE3F > > > > /* The flags that may vary depending on security flavor: */ > > -#define NFSEXP_SECINFO_FLAGS 0 > > +#define NFSEXP_SECINFO_FLAGS NFSEXP_READONLY > > > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > > > You have two patches called "knfsd: nfsd4: make readonly access depend on > pseudoflavor". This one appears to have the wrong title and changelog. hm, I ended up accidentally losing this patch altogether. But knfsd-nfsd-enforce-per-flavor-id-squashing.patch rubs out its effects, so we end up OK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
