On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 10:14:51AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I'll update my patch tomorrow to restore the definition of current. > > I do fear, however, that this will perpetuate the polution of the > > namespace should "current" ever get cleaned up. > > It can probably get cleaned up after 2.4 by making current() the actual > inline. For 2.2 it won't change. Consider it a feature. > > It was done originally because the 2.0 code using #define based current > generated better code than using inline functions. 2.2 upwards use a different > (far nicer) method to find current. The macro is still likely to generate better code. All released gcc versions have the "inline penalty" causing bad register allocation (maybe it'll be fixed with gcc 3's tree inliner) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Releas... Gérard Roudier
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Alan Cox
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Releas... Steven N. Hirsch
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA R... Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BE... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Releas... Alan Cox
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA R... Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BE... Alan Cox
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Releas... Alan Cox
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Andi Kleen
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Steven N. Hirsch
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released J . A . Magallon
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released J . A . Magallon
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: Adaptec AIC7XXX v 6.0.6 BETA Released Steven N. Hirsch