On 11/22/18 10:42 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Are we willing to go in the direction for inclusion of a new system > call, subset of it appears on sysfs etc ? My primary concern is not > how the attribute information appears on the sysfs but lack of it's > completeness.
A new system call makes total sense to me. I have the same concern about the completeness of what's exposed in sysfs, I just don't see a _route_ to completeness with sysfs itself. Thus, the minimalist approach as a first step.
