On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:03:28 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, Linus, > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > When replying, please rewrite the subject suitably and try to Cc: the > > appropriate developer(s). > > > i386-hpet-check-if-the-counter-works.patch > > nohz-fix-nohz-x86-dyntick-idle-handling.patch > > acpi-move-timer-broadcast-and-pmtimer-access-before-c3-arbiter-shutdown.patch > > clockevents-fix-typo-in-acpi_pmc.patch > > timekeeping-fixup-shadow-variable-argument.patch > > timerc-cleanup-recently-introduced-whitespace-damage.patch > > clockevents-remove-prototypes-of-removed-functions.patch > > clockevents-fix-resume-logic.patch > > clockevents-fix-device-replacement.patch > > tick-management-spread-timer-interrupt.patch > > highres-improve-debug-output.patch > > hrtimer-speedup-hrtimer_enqueue.patch > > pcspkr-use-the-global-pit-lock.patch > > ntp-move-the-cmos-update-code-into-ntpc.patch > > i386-pit-stop-only-when-in-periodic-or-oneshot-mode.patch > > i386-remove-volatile-in-apicc.patch > > i386-hpet-assumes-boot-cpu-is-0.patch > > i386-move-pit-function-declarations-and-constants-to-correct-header-file.patch > > These got sent to Andi as well, but the patches are independent of the > x86_64 conversion. > > These are bugfixes (nohz-fix-nohz-x86-dyntick-idle-handling.patch) and > general improvements of the core code and the existing i386 code. > > Can we please merge the above now ? > > I can resend them or setup a git repo if you want. > > Andi, any objections against the above i386 fixlets ? > They all look pretty innocuous to me. Could you please take a second look, decide if any of them should also be in 2.6.22.x and let me know? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
