4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vasily Averin <v...@virtuozzo.com>
commit 873d7bcfd066663e3e50113dc4a0de19289b6354 upstream.
Commit a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node")
changed 'avail_lists' field of 'struct swap_info_struct' to an array.
In popular linux distros it increased size of swap_info_struct up to 40
Kbytes and now swap_info_struct allocation requires order-4 page.
Switch to kvzmalloc allows to avoid unexpected allocation failures.
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fc23172d-3c75-21e2-d551-8b1808cbe...@virtuozzo.com
Fixes: a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <v...@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Aaron Lu <aaron...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.hu...@intel.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_sw
unsigned int type;
int i;
- p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
+ p = kvzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -2841,7 +2841,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_sw
}
if (type >= MAX_SWAPFILES) {
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
- kfree(p);
+ kvfree(p);
return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
}
if (type >= nr_swapfiles) {
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_sw
smp_wmb();
nr_swapfiles++;
} else {
- kfree(p);
+ kvfree(p);
p = swap_info[type];
/*
* Do not memset this entry: a racing procfs swap_next()
