On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 2:17 PM Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote: > Which gets us back to Tim's fixup patch. Do you still prefer the revert, > given the existence of that?
I don't think the code needs to be reverted, but the *behavior* of
just unconditionally enabling STIBP needs to be reverted.
Because it was clearly way more expensive than people were told.
Linus
