On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:35:33AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> > > __is_constexpr() is a work of art, understandable only to the most > respected wizards of C. Even sparse doesn't seem to belong to that > group and warns that there's an "expression using sizeof(void)". > > Just hide the definition from sparse and pretend it's always true.
The development version of sparse doesn't issues a warning for sizeof(void) soon after the introduction of __is_constexpr() and sparse's main tree have been updated (very recently). I strongly believe this patch shouldn't be. Regards, -- Luc
