Hi Peter,
Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> 于2018年11月12日周一 下午2:57写道：
>
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > I think you only need the less thing, because:
> >
> > static inline bool prio_lower(int a, int b)
> > {
> > return a > b;
> > }
>
> I'd say that should be named rt_prio_lower(), even if it's local to
> sched/rt.c, right?
>I agree with Ingo's point of view. Looks great. What is your opinion? If you also agree. I will update the patch and send it. Thanks.
