4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Sanskriti Sharma <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit ce49d8436cffa9b7a6a5f110879d53e89dbc6746 ] Ensure that all code paths in strbuf_addv() call va_end() on the ap_saved copy that was made. Fixes the following coverity complaint: Error: VARARGS (CWE-237): [#def683] tools/perf/util/strbuf.c:106: missing_va_end: va_end was not called for "ap_saved". Signed-off-by: Sanskriti Sharma <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Joe Lawrence <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- tools/perf/util/strbuf.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c @@ -98,19 +98,25 @@ static int strbuf_addv(struct strbuf *sb va_copy(ap_saved, ap); len = vsnprintf(sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len, fmt, ap); - if (len < 0) + if (len < 0) { + va_end(ap_saved); return len; + } if (len > strbuf_avail(sb)) { ret = strbuf_grow(sb, len); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + va_end(ap_saved); return ret; + } len = vsnprintf(sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len, fmt, ap_saved); va_end(ap_saved); if (len > strbuf_avail(sb)) { pr_debug("this should not happen, your vsnprintf is broken"); + va_end(ap_saved); return -EINVAL; } } + va_end(ap_saved); return strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + len); }
