4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Sanskriti Sharma <sansh...@redhat.com> [ Upstream commit ce49d8436cffa9b7a6a5f110879d53e89dbc6746 ] Ensure that all code paths in strbuf_addv() call va_end() on the ap_saved copy that was made. Fixes the following coverity complaint: Error: VARARGS (CWE-237): [#def683] tools/perf/util/strbuf.c:106: missing_va_end: va_end was not called for "ap_saved". Signed-off-by: Sanskriti Sharma <sansh...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawre...@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538490554-8161-2-git-send-email-sansh...@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- tools/perf/util/strbuf.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c @@ -105,19 +105,25 @@ static int strbuf_addv(struct strbuf *sb va_copy(ap_saved, ap); len = vsnprintf(sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len, fmt, ap); - if (len < 0) + if (len < 0) { + va_end(ap_saved); return len; + } if (len > strbuf_avail(sb)) { ret = strbuf_grow(sb, len); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + va_end(ap_saved); return ret; + } len = vsnprintf(sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len, fmt, ap_saved); va_end(ap_saved); if (len > strbuf_avail(sb)) { pr_debug("this should not happen, your vsnprintf is broken"); + va_end(ap_saved); return -EINVAL; } } + va_end(ap_saved); return strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + len); }
