3.16.61-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>

commit 2026d35741f2c3ece73c11eb7e4a15d7c2df9ebe upstream.

The function __builtin_expect returns long type (see the gcc
documentation), and so do macros likely and unlikely. Unfortunatelly, when
CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES is selected, the macros likely and
unlikely expand to __branch_check__ and __branch_check__ truncates the
long type to int. This unintended truncation may cause bugs in various
kernel code (we found a bug in dm-writecache because of it), so it's
better to fix __branch_check__ to return long.

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.lrh.2.02.1805300818140.24...@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1f0d69a9fc815 ("tracing: profile likely and unlikely annotations")
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 include/linux/compiler.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_
 #define unlikely_notrace(x)    __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
 
 #define __branch_check__(x, expect) ({                                 \
-                       int ______r;                                    \
+                       long ______r;                                   \
                        static struct ftrace_branch_data                \
                                __attribute__((__aligned__(4)))         \
                                
__attribute__((section("_ftrace_annotated_branch"))) \

Reply via email to