3.16.61-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Silvio Cesare <silvio.ces...@gmail.com>
commit 353748a359f1821ee934afc579cf04572406b420 upstream.
There is potential for the size and len fields in ubifs_data_node to be
too large causing either a negative value for the length fields or an
integer overflow leading to an incorrect memory allocation. Likewise,
when the len field is small, an integer underflow may occur.
Signed-off-by: Silvio Cesare <silvio.ces...@gmail.com>
Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: We have a different set of length variables in
recomp_data_node()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
fs/ubifs/journal.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ubifs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/journal.c
@@ -1099,10 +1099,11 @@ out_free:
static int recomp_data_node(struct ubifs_data_node *dn, int *new_len)
{
void *buf;
- int err, len, compr_type, out_len;
+ int err, compr_type;
+ u32 len, out_len;
out_len = le32_to_cpu(dn->size);
- buf = kmalloc(out_len * WORST_COMPR_FACTOR, GFP_NOFS);
+ buf = kmalloc_array(out_len, WORST_COMPR_FACTOR, GFP_NOFS);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
