On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:13:43 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More like "device unregistering itself from its attribute" vs. "whatever > else". Ah, ok. I don't think we can make those the same, but "trigger an action and return" vs. "whatever else" may be possible. > > >>> A general immediate disconnect of the buffers (which will be handled in > >>> a second pass) would be great, but doesn't sound easy. > >> I haven't thought too hard about actual implementation but it's pretty > >> specific case. If doing things in generic manner is difficult, there > >> are plenty of shortcuts to choose from, I think. > > > > The "second pass" approach where the store method calls the sysfs core > > or sets a flag or whatever sounds doable, but I'm not sure how general > > we can get. Maybe for all store methods that just trigger an action. > > Hmm... I'll give it a shot in a few days. Cool. I'd try myself, but I'm currently a bit short on time :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
