On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I must also say that I'm disappointed you'd try to do things this way.
> I'd be (have been?) willing to actually help you understand the problem
> and add the annotations, but rather than answer my question ("where do I
> find the right git tree"!) you just send a revert patch.Sorry that I had not yet provided that information. You should have received this information through another e-mail thread. See also http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-October/020493.html. > To do that, you have to understand what recursion is valid (I'm guessing > there's some sort of layering involved), and I'm far from understanding > anything about the code that triggered this report. I don't think there is any kind of recursion involved in the NVMe code that triggered the lockdep complaint. Sagi, please correct me if I got this wrong. Bart.
