4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.k...@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 8d6ccf5cebbc7ed1dee9986e36853a78dfb64084 ]

As part of sdw_stream_remove_master(), sdw_stream_remove_slave() is called
which results in bus lock being acquired twice.

So, fix it by performing specific Slave remove operations in
sdw_release_master_stream() instead of calling sdw_stream_remove_slave().

Signed-off-by: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.k...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shreyas NC <shreyas...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vk...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/soundwire/stream.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
@@ -899,9 +899,10 @@ static void sdw_release_master_stream(st
        struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt = stream->m_rt;
        struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt, *_s_rt;
 
-       list_for_each_entry_safe(s_rt, _s_rt,
-                       &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node)
-               sdw_stream_remove_slave(s_rt->slave, stream);
+       list_for_each_entry_safe(s_rt, _s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
+               sdw_slave_port_release(s_rt->slave->bus, s_rt->slave, stream);
+               sdw_release_slave_stream(s_rt->slave, stream);
+       }
 
        list_del(&m_rt->bus_node);
 }


Reply via email to