On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:20:12PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:01:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 11:45:20AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>...
> > You always have to decide between some debug code and some small bit of
> > performance. There's a reason why options to disable things like BUG()
> > or printk() are in the kernel config menus hidden behind CONFIG_EMBEDDED
> > although they obviously have some performance impact.
>
> It is not for the CPU performance they can be disabled, but for the code
> size which is a real problem on embedded system. While you often have
> mem/cpu_mhz ratios around 1GB/1GHz on servers and desktops, you more often
> have ratios like 16MB/500MHz which is 1:32 of the former. That's why you
> optimize for size at the expense of speed on such systems.
The latter is not true for my two examples.
CONFIG_PRINTK=n, CONFIG_BUG=n will obviously make the kernel both
smaller and faster. [1]
> Regards,
> Willy
cu
Adrian
[1] faster due to less code to execute and positive cache effects due to
the smaller code [2]
[2] whether the "faster" is big enough that it is in any way measurable
is a different question
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
