Hi!
> > > > @@ -80,9 +82,11 @@ static int __init acpi_sleep_setup(char
> > > >
> > > > __setup("acpi_sleep=", acpi_sleep_setup);
> > > >
> > > > +/* Ouch, we want to delete this. We already have better version in
> > > userspace, in
> > > > + s2ram from suspend.sf.net project */
> > >
> > > Do we? This version has advantages in not requiring any userspace app and
> in
> > > being able to work even if you can't yet get as far as having
> >
> > Take a look at the file. It has whitelist with just one entry, too
> > bad.
>
> The contents of the whitelist are irrelevant. My laptop needs this
> functionality, but I haven't bothered to send you a whitelist entry, in part
> because I don't use s2ram.
>
> Regardless of that, if you had read the whole comment (you've deleted half of
> it), you would have noticed that I ended up changing my mind and instead
> saying "Why not just delete the __setup now, or at least put it in the
> deprecated file?"
That should be certainly done in separate patch, right? It is on my
todolist somewhere now.
> > > > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ real_save_cr3: .long 0
> > > > real_save_cr4: .long 0
> > > > real_magic: .long 0
> > > > video_mode: .long 0
> > > > -video_flags: .long 0
> > > > +realmode_flags: .long 0
> > > > beep_flags: .long 0
> > > > real_efer_save_restore: .long 0
> > > > real_save_efer_edx: .long 0
> > >
> > > Beep_flags should be removed too if you're sticking with /proc.
> >
> > Fixed.
>
> Ta. But you didn't answer the question - why /proc and not sysfs?
Do you seriously advocate setting two bits of one variable from /proc,
and one more bit from /sys?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
