* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:19:19PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS], lock_class_ops);
> 
> > @@ -179,9 +181,30 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct lockdep_stats, lockdep_stats);
> >     }                                                               \
> >     __total;                                                        \
> >  })
> > +
> > +static inline void debug_class_ops_inc(struct lock_class *class)
> > +{
> > +   int idx;
> > +
> > +   idx = class - lock_classes;
> > +   __this_cpu_inc(lock_class_ops[idx]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned long debug_class_ops_read(struct lock_class *class)
> > +{
> > +   int idx, cpu;
> > +   unsigned long ops = 0;
> > +
> > +   idx = class - lock_classes;
> > +   for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > +           ops += per_cpu(lock_class_ops[idx], cpu);
> > +   return ops;
> > +}
> 
> Would it make sense to stick that in struct lockdep_stats ?
> 
> A little something like:
> 
> struct lockdep_stats {
>       /* ... */
>       int     lock_class_ops[MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS];
> };

Did you shrink the 'long' to 'int' intentionally?

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to