3.16.59-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

commit b849a812f7eb92e96d1c8239b06581b2cfd8b275 upstream.

Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE in seccomp() because seccomp does not allow to
widen restrictions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct
        int state = arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(task, which);
 
        if (state > 0 && (state & PR_SPEC_PRCTL))
-               arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_DISABLE);
+               arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE);
 }
 
 static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(unsigned long seccomp_mode)

Reply via email to